No. 18-5739
Terril Kinchen v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bank-fraud civil-procedure constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance sentencing standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal bank fraud statute plainly covered the defendant's conduct
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
estions PRESENTE) FoR Rete _ Whither Hh bral nark ptaanly orved ar PY tet tel the: defendant Ny pl i npg 4y domme co 92H(¢) Chageh wher oo ; lwSucod fo Iphnsonl v. United States 135 5. cr. 2561 (2016) Whether Sezoisns ve Dirnaya, 5344 Ur5o__, 138 5. 67, 1264 (201%) Puccuont to belles v. Unvked Shes, Bll F.3d 1267 | ”Cu.2011) are bench ual to Mr. Kinchen TT RESTED HARTEES There aren paches 40 the proceed other than thie named inthe caphen of tee ote, ABLE Oe _Cofexts Quesho pad) FOC RIEU. nan ween nnn neal
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent