Whether the Supreme Court should review the role of constitutional law in excluding particular litigants based on previous filings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Lithether Cad Niwo Role of Conshtshenal baw) : by the SoPrée we Cbouct to 442. Daided Sto+tis Mads (Rte teoaedve te the states ie Subtect . fo Exclode Parteular Wi gants leased on Freviious FI ngs. ? Lohsther fab bonecs Sentence L Noung Vor : , to Lifs. without Poeols for Sinople Robhecy fucsvant to (s. 814.13) Fle.sta+. fre] thon. Kind of Porrshmusant tontime lated ve Comite v. Alabe ma. Cave. Fo and & C7] luhether the Instant Case ‘6 tntitttd te Mendetedl vid entiary hearing an the thrashoid lesur . oF LiFe usthhout Preole on uvimbes the Wass Under the Age oF 1% uthen tale Crimnea Ore_. -Retaty V. Tamayo Rays, |