Did the judge violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ISSUE (1) : Did the Honorable Judge James S. Moody Jr. violate Mr. Molina’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in conjunction with the due process clause...by stating the jury found Mr. Molina guilty of 922(g)(1) and 924(e) as to Count (1), and 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) as to Count (2) See V-56, Pg 3. And the jury verdict form only states 922(g)(1) as to Count (1) . and 841(a)(1) as to Count (2) ? . ISSUE (2) . Did the Government err by enhancing Mr. Molina’s sentence, by applying 924(e) and 841(b)(1)(C). And his prior conviction case No.: 99-8690, does not meet the definition set forth in 924(e) nor 841(b)(1)(C), That for a prior conviction to qualify as a serious drug offense has to carry a maximum sentence of ten years or more prescribed by law as set forth in Smith v. \ United States, 775 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2014) ? ISSUE (3) Did trial counsel err by not attempting to bar the seating of a bias juror, by stating that law informants office's should be the only ones to carry guns. And was appellant counsel ineffective for failing to argue this issue on direct appeal ? ISSUE (4) : , Does a defendant have to prove government inducement before proving government official... Even when the . “government intentionally changed "CI" to "CV" as in this case, WITH THE INTENT to hinder petitioner from proving GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL? See V-70 pg 45 at 3 thru 9. (Requesting judicial Notice Of An Judicative Fact Rule 201(a)). | TRULINCS 53678018 MOLINA, MIGUEL ANTHONY Unit: COL-B-D FROM: 53678018 TO: Dejesus, Malinda SUBJECT: