Whether the United States Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits a state from convicting a defendant for a statutory sexual offense based on past conduct that was not criminal at the time it occurred

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED NeceSary~ VF Mouy cae conver and sentence a defendant Rettwreor an accused for skctdoy sexed farce state based a Aecsections ahd identian, picks ened, tha ave oF Breible k sewal conduct’ 2 . qth Does dhe Onited Siar Convliloleng” Gomes) A rendmrent ard under the EX Post facts ase pohiba or pieces BQ convent mn the Poy of cho Sktke ty (Arie Sec 10 ,US. Conse | 2 et ee ree Dk a cc at Rrchle seus Mewes 7 seperate , disperse Ceimind prempaan che Row of ‘ { , : A anna prackne on bars of Past deyece. Berae compiisn” Prepevtne ant Grev] based on she sire Single ade como on Third dayee stekkoy crime, a @ mereage ab « vatimak the Gwe of dee Bribie sexu Perce surg ©) Conus on bess ob a Pradble sewal conduct Eneible compision oerse, auc den édd tbe CONRKION a a( stake deve core] b so he. & Gge\ Cote ESSA, ae, valet thon whee abs an) TL Dee Ge Equal Prokeckian Cliuse &the U5 Constrevaim allay the DT ~ apply Gre seakdd irwctanslity” as i depive tase Mvedns breeds, ob Expression and Speech \ewing dclrdemteAcPerses MmoperAwe( inopecdbe) and hence rus-labeling vickwy by de MiS(EDBRH icy, ot dheic €ports p kions ox d sealed stcrerenk law by the Runtiea OF OLLBGHNS OF Bede SEY Crimes and § 3 y and published verdiceay, Applying Stadbtery, crominl Siabies Be cccosan? Ht Bache acts? Z: Does tle ease oe gkaie u Coma, demmrinote. both, Sh Rat ane VilaGrn and Dube “Je pard, ?