No. 18-5754

Ivan Rodrigo Campillo Restrepo v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-precedent criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing habeas-corpus jurisdiction mandate-recall penal-term retroactivity sentencing statutory-maximum supreme-court-ruling writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-recall-of-mandate-should-issue

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER RECALL OF THE MANDATE SHOULD ISSUE TO REMEDY A PENAL +” TERM IMPOSED BEYOND THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM WHEN ABROGATED CIRCUIT PRECEDENT CONTROLS BASED ON A SUBSEQUENT SUPREME COURT RULING? JURISDICTION : Upon disposing of both the petition to recall the direct appeal mandate and reconsideration of the same, pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §1254, by way of the mailbox rule afforded to incarcerated litigants, jurisdiction is conferred for . consideration to issue the instant petition to issue a Writ of Certiorari to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals before the High Court. . i

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-05-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)

Attorneys

Ivan R. Campillo Restrepo
Ivan Rodrigo Campillo Restrepo — Petitioner
Ivan Rodrigo Campillo Restrepo — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent