Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it denied the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing?

No question identified. : : , Crestron Heseuted | I) Did the Nistaet Courk abuse rt diserchon Wheat tt denied the Ptriomers 2 USC. 2155 Moho without an EVidenhary hearing ? hlas the deninl of A COA Also Erroneous ? 1) Was the Pebower depened of effeclave Assistante. oF Counsel ON Direct APP eal ANd luring the ‘Lid Motion to Suppress ? 3) Did the Pisttiet Court Jury Chaege. lary Dasteuchons And NndietMert Mischde the Lal? DP so did ths MiscdateMent Of Law clepewe the Pehtioner of A fair +einl, A UNAN MoUs Jury. Verdict | fad rause the Pelrhoney fo be Under ‘gee OF Convieton for & Non-existent OMEN SE © ,