No. 18-5763
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights diligence-standard due-process insanity insanity-defense jurisdiction legal-diligence mental-capacity mental-handicap procedural-fairness standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Arkansas Supreme Court violate due process by denying mentally handicapped petitioner opportunity to litigate insanity at time of trial?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED IL DID THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT VIOLATE DUE PROCESS BY ~ DENYING MENTALLY HANDICAPPED PETITIONER OPPORTUNITY TO LITIGATE INSANITY AT TIME OF TRIAL? IL. SHOULD ONE WHO IS MENTALLY HANDICAPPED BE HELD TO THE : SAME DILIGENCE STANDARD AS THOSE WHO LACK THE HANDICAP (SHOULD THE LACK OF MENTAL CAPABILITY EXCUSE LACK OF DILIGENCE)? / : y ‘oe “he ; , , . ? ° oO
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-07
Brief of respondent Arkansas in opposition filed.
2018-10-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 10, 2018.
2018-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2018 to December 10, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-09
Response Requested. (Due November 8, 2018)
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-21
Waiver of right of respondent Arkansas to respond filed.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Arkansas