No. 18-5774
Rochelle Driessen v. Royal Bank of Scotland
IFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-conflict civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-review procedural-standard standing summary-order supreme-court supreme-court-precedent united-states-court-of-appeals
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's May 25, 2017, summary order is in direct conflict with a decision of the United States Supreme Court in Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION (S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S MAY 25, 2017, SUMMARY ORDER IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A DECISION OF THE , UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN NEITZKE vy. WILLIAMS, 490 U.S. 319 (1989) a rr » : ,
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2017-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2018)
Attorneys
Rochelle Driessen
Rochelle Driessen — Petitioner