No. 18-5775
William Christopher Hogan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split conflict-of-circuits criminal-history fifth-circuit ninth-circuit sentencing shop-lifting shoplifting texas-state texas-state-law u.s.-supreme-court-rule-10
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court erred in sentencing Petitioner by adding one point to his criminal history score based on a Texas State shop lifting conviction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court erred in sentencing Petitioner by adding one point to his criminal history score based on a Texas State shop lifting conviction. Petitioner urges that there is a conflict between rulings from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. U.S.Supreme Court R. 10. 1.
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent