Whether petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him were violated

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER PETITIONER’S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CONFRONT WITNESSES AGAINST HIM WERE VIOLATED WHEN THE PROSECUTOR PROVIDED TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY STATEMENTS AND PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF A NON-LISTED AND NON-TESTIFYING WITNESS TO PROVE THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER ASSERTED IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN CRAWFORD AND IT’S PROGENY. | 2. WHETHER PETITIONER’S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE | VIOLATED WHERE PETITIONER PRESENTED CLAIMS OF SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE VIOLATIONS TO THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS WHERE THE COURTS REMAINED SILENT TO AND NEVER ADDRESSED OR RULED UPON THE MERITS OF THE CLAIMS SUSPENDING PETITIONER’S HABEAS. CORPUS REVIEW OF THOSE CLAIMS. 1 INMATE '18/6/12 A61D011013714 50 , INMATE 16/6/12 A61DOTI0I9714 50 |