No. 18-5800

Brent F. Williams v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-jurisdiction article-iii case-or-controversy civil-procedure heckler-v-chaney mootness mootness-doctrine standing standing-article-iii-constitution
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court lacks jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution, Case or Controversy clause, in light of Heckler v. Chaney

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the District Court lacks jurisdiction under under. Article III of the.Constitution, Case or Constroversy clause, in light of Heckler v. Chaney, 470 US 821 (1985) 2. Whether Primary Administrative Jurisdiction required the District Court to abstain from adjudicating matters within the exclusive jurisdiction of the administrative . agency, empowered by Congress to administer the statutes. ' 3. Whether the Government lacked standing to prosecute the Petitioner under Article III of the Constitution. 4. Whether the Doctrine of Mootness divested the District : Court of Jurisdiction, when the case or controversy became moot, and no longer existed. / / i.

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2018)

Attorneys

Brent F. Williams
Brent F. Williams — Petitioner
Brent F. Williams — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent