No. 18-5801
Harvey Eugene Larson v. Doug Moore, Parole Officer, et al.
IFP
Tags: cause-of-action civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus legal-standing pleading prisoner-rights standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment Punishment Patent
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment Punishment Patent
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did claims state a cause of action?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTION(S) PRESENTED . Did claim(s) state a cause of action? :
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2018)