Does Webb v. Texas apply when it is the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office who systematically threatens, coerces, intimidates, and actually offers to pay a key defense witness to prevent her from testifying at trial?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does Webb v. Texas apply when it is the Orleans Parish District Attemey's Office who systematically threatens, coerces, intimidates, and actually offers to pay a key defense witness to prevent her from testifying a trial? 2. Is it “structural error” when the trial court judge refuses to bring this key defense witness “inchamberg” to put these threats, coercion, intimidation, and offers of payment into the trial court record for appellate review? 3. Is it an abuse of discretion for the trial court judge to state into the record, “this had nothing to do with the trial,” despite repeated requests by defense counsel? 4. Is it a violation of Due Process of Law when the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office ; illegally use “fake subpeonas” to threaten, coerce, and intimidate key defense witnesses? 5. Is it permitted for a defendant to supplement the record with prosecutorial files that clearly prove a claim pursued with diligence through all state and federal courts? 6. Is it thwarting a valid claim when the prosecution conceals facts that prove a defendant's claim? . 7. Is “Brady” evidence turned over “in-chambers” by the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office during trial still “Brady” and subject to Brady's requirements? 8. Is it a violation of defendant's Sixth Amendment right to cross-examination when the trial judge “in-chambers” stops trial counsel from asking state witnesses about this impeaching evidence?