Whether the Eleventh Circuit's 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) pattern jury instruction violates the Sixth Amendment because it concludes that the crutial question as to - whether the robberies alleged are "crimes of violence" for purpose -of Section § 924(c) are questions of law to be determined by.the district court ?

Whether after the Supreme Court's decision in Sessions v. Dimaya, 138 S. Ct. 1204, 200 L. Ed. 2d 549 (2018), Section § 924(c) is unconstitutional ?

Whether the Supreme Court should difinitively resolve whether § 924(c)(3)(B)'s "residual clause" is unconstitutional in order to promote uniformity of federal law in light of Sessions v. Dimaya ?

Whether Sessions v. Dimaya, is retroactive for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) ?

Whether the Eleventh Circuit's 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) pattern jury instruction violates the Sixth Amendment