No. 18-582

Stephen Yagman v. Michael J. Colello

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: anti-SLAPP civil-procedure federal-procedure federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure iqbal rules-enabling-act supreme-court-precedent twombly
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment ClassAction Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state anti-SLAPP statute can be used to dismiss a claim in federal court when its application is contrary to the Rules Enabling Act, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 56, and Supreme Court precedent

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED May a state anti-SLAPP statute be used to dismiss a claim in federal court, when its application is contrary to the Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2072, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 56, and Supreme Court precedent, established in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)? | ii

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-04
Supplemental Brief of Stephen Yagman submitted.
2019-01-03
Supplemental brief of petitioner Stephen Yagman filed. (Distributed)
2018-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 5, 2018)

Attorneys

Stephen Yagman
Stephen Yagman — Petitioner
Stephen Yagman — Petitioner
Stephen Yagman — Petitioner