No. 18-5830

A. L., the Father v. Florida Department of Children and Families

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2018-08-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment brown-vs-board civil-procedure civil-procedure-due-process civil-rights due-process free-speech parental-rights shaken-baby-syndrome standing
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether per curiam affirm decision without reaching merits of the case violated due-process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Whether per. curiam affirm descision without reach Ng Merits of the case Violated Due Process Sth jyxk Us CAR — 2. Whether ad ads coding the Fakher ocearding to OW Statute We does Not qUarlfy Ger 1S Veolative o£ ue Process S4* 14k 0.5 C..4? 3. \s VaMinig the Parental Rights of Nithuv ears after he death of Kis S Howth 4\) beoy Niden Leslie C Quintin) Pakeick is suspected of the | death Shaken Babs Syndvome ) While Mé Leslie 7 is iNcarcelated he called queers prior te Depé of his children lew+ul ZLCOY ing yo Fhe Constitutian BS sth de® USC Ne

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent Florida Department of Children and Families to respond filed.
2018-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2018)

Attorneys

A. L.
Arthur Leslie — Petitioner
Arthur Leslie — Petitioner
Florida Department of Children and Families
Sarah J. RumphFlorida Department of Children & Families, Respondent
Sarah J. RumphFlorida Department of Children & Families, Respondent
Guardian ad Litem Program
Thomasina Fornash MooreFlorida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Respondent
Thomasina Fornash MooreFlorida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Respondent