Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

No question identified. : —SEEoOeee>>>———E a .a > rybM Oe . , fia SE cr; ELM, a ME US ioe WW (eSB T Tp "hh Ab VIEL, TED Me SAWN UM, OWA TE UMW kits AT f/2 CWE. HWS Or % LAS VA3 Lod IV WA 3 Cue Witkite WN SEND WHEE OE. Tid A beef pyr OTHE 2 fe MDD ae ce Gime ° ny VEN ITISYI LS bv CO ey ME OF L 3MY DID | YET FOR HSS Ve ONTAMI YET? Somes 10, Stuf po: oe i ss VAT Fiabe) ? 1 ize ray ED iia 5. Wihy DiI Y2, tle SE TOME D0 CDE He POY Le £3 OF AOL VE. fe TE AV. C0 -5E UU YEbt 2, ay GWA 17 Oe ‘yy Lo Se tisha, Mog Fe THE LSC 13 YT, MEET OF AVS EC ve MED ICAL We FLL) DENT tL, Eig LONTN) (i0-E L/P FO 4, L eher re DEL SOLA. ALCS VL 4 Wy DID LE FCA (TCV S109?) SEPEM iB utr Cai NY CLT IE Men de whh CM Anh. Vp Gin hy <M, THAT fOFESAL 9 Mh ~ Lenin? EFL SL ELD, {Tl FE Uh ob dirorviy tifa R One Vib eeD bypee The SUATO ye VOB OKCo daw. 4 DINOLE. LID 1, 2M , AL ve MAMEL SY V3 IPL Hide fe LEA WIE vf TISYYT ILE Zw. D _ ; y WV AL VEAL Te -SF0S a 38 7S7F —> (bWhy bi HEATH CME | Sb iL tn ihe nafs vibee. DEM ORthry = ~~ Ente tf yg ON” ered fess he WH Witte 70 fl SE PUMINTHE° THS LHI | CELRVSE OL ML WESTTENT BIE UEEIM THe ed bowrewow WHO 473847 18 9 Fleer bATORS M Dowty Ad L leet Aw) | } ee :