Whether a mental state of recklessness absent subjective intent to threaten is sufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. 875(c) and any other threat statute

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED — Qvestion FI . tohedner a mental state of recklessness —absnt ° Subiective went to threaten — in Conveying a sheeot is subficient oe seoppork a Conviction under 18 vs.c.3 81Sic) ard any other MWreat stalote (sé Thet 3S, aS applied, mony & AeCencdant be wrongly Convictecd solely under a fecklessness shorcars in Arve ~ theoed prosecutions 2 idelhec inlecpreding 8 0S.C 8 87S@) ard other threat sictules lo include Sstolements made cwithooth a Sbiechive went Jo khreaden, Chills the expression of Prolectact speech ¢ Thet 1S, may allasing a Conviclian order SIS@), OS applial, to Mckde slatemenlsS mode without a scdoyectwe inlent to Ltnreaden videte the FEicst Amerdment ? ' y .