No. 18-5854

Joe Leonard Lambright v. Arizona

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2018-08-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process incarceration-credit life-sentence parole sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Punishment
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a defendant's death sentence is vacated and a life sentence with the possibility of parole after 25 years imposed in its place, is the Due Process Clause violated when a state court adopts a novel construction of statutory language which denies him incarceration credit he would otherwise be constitutionally entitled to under the Double Jeopardy Clause?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED When a defendant’s death sentence is vacated and a life sentence with the possibility of parole after 25 years imposed in its place, is the Due Process Clause violated when a state court adopts a novel construction of statutory language which denies him incarceration credit he would otherwise be constitutionally entitled to under the Double Jeopardy Clause? 1

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-09-04
Waiver of right of respondent State of Arizona to respond filed.
2018-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 1, 2018)

Attorneys

Joe Lambright
Natman SchayeArizona Capital Representation Project, Petitioner
State of Arizona
Ginger JarvisOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent