Whether the cumulative effect of multiple constitutional violations, including ineffective assistance of counsel, deprived the defendant of a fair trial

No question identified. : ' ' ee es A ‘amet MLO? QO On CouaTe fal Aanpea OLS C AS bon = Cogn Zasle Undec law aCumula ~ | | e Gaategate SAUGICE O1M. A 2 nq Mt ple GACound Anar An INiette 2 OSS ANCE 6 OUNSel . iv) Q Amends 6 iy olarion, Ae the Detendan ONSTiTUNnOMAa | | ld YY) Q OWTCA Ip. eTrichignd Mids 1.1.04 TDN alo LU | : : 0 lcs (1494) and ifs progeny? | | | | a; e 40 © [2 67 _D O2Nd Bs SAS ON GvoIe GOUO ay | ( 2 : Ne DVooT NECHEd OF Ine CleMeEnTsS OF ME Na ge I opecil: ally > \d/hen the State Uses o (oc more) 4 Q aera MA NTE Me Nece Q D pot 6 NC. ~ elem or ine Chane Ale the Detendan Sixth And | pucteent, Amendments Violated? == | i ' ‘ LAapnle CH ONTE N ge | 0 [Ciskies of tins ad ees $$ | | eg ont ' Question No. 6 2b la: inal ORDER Circuit Court Virginia. Beacl, Ia: Pel BRB: Pet hon fo ehearing enba HO. preme. CP J IR VA Cou oa Apnea = Di aé Aopen Opi ion Q Ic: tollected Case IMularive, Pree AC 3 x Merion Lo Ke I ‘ Cp nan wealmM Beiet in Oppes bv) Teast ah Han | if}, heel mendments_! Sage | LM Hy Amendment a | i Ci AGM Ain S atute.¢ Ss AB eh 41281 Lo | Faas fi —_ | | he , | A de fon. £18. 2-22 Conca _ C BR B. Code Aoo. $18,.2-/8 | a [ Cade (acd § [6 /8 Principle ia the Jad deg 2— [ Tee. ~ 66; 18.2-84 Stadudroy Buca la = ) ls iciland_v. ¥ pe 2tuer Sulbatd Le " 7 . sa Astro Mend OgAen ab lhS 04% C1984 3 , | a See ak aa ter me . 7 1 2 liashie. ot (i488 | lh ite wv (Jo ae A __(aTe 4 Deuces nef. cee Con —_ lo, well: BUS 30. (2004 Nvslee " 2uda-Becnal, 458 Us ASA (14B yo Wowhect o Eto iq (144: ], 7 ‘ . Gu .* an Or, | ‘one eC Sbo_Us 444 (200 A3 TH utatl ta OS.¢ 2 20\6 A3 Iautence v Cher, Sieg lea (aa) | ole man LnASoin Ao. gOlc6 2OlD O lu ANITCA STATE Ap im Co RL ad q128; O Mori sce tte AMITEM STATE SLA ile o | | ates JA 00 Us 34 q41 33 I wladdiagdon ACAUS Ad 2a4_ 84 2004: 2b WWichocy v United Ghbes, ld Us Yna Cie) lacheeatt chal vTemestee GY ch qi (aw) | 3 | en | | | [ ( | | | | [tig | i tions of Opinions and Orders ppondy I Final ORDER of the Ciceuik Court af the Cily Q | ieginia Beach Ch 1e-4474 $B.01-4S4 Virginia Palit nn fo lites of Habeas Cocpus_s Fvidenciacy Hearing Denies [Pedibion Denied with Prejudice Apcil 11, 201 2. Petition far Bonen! GA.ni-tsd b Vicginia Supreme |B done = "the Court cefuses the pelition fae ap Al on. NO | eversible. ex arin ths 4 udgena complained of Iareh S 2olé | Petition Fac Reheacing (en banc) Denied Meu lb, 2012 |B | Lc ginko ourtot Aoneals pinion * Record ne. 1898-/4-| D I. s denied” . Vicginia Supcems Court , Recocd no IS1ad! lon Pelion Bix Bppedl with Assignment of Ecmes; “ Relicer)” | Lo Constidubional eo iision atutes.._¢ H I. Cumulative Eftert The colleched case a Ig Metion To Shrile + Tr, ulalaoi pp. 242-24 a lin etion Denied _; Abuse of Discretion by Court erroneous . | indings of fact Cp, 260) | | Pt , a | | | , ee | () T APREM UR O = ANU ATE § | te Iwilliam David Cannon. one OoOMmonWealth o dinta._Viceector Den 2 | Re hon dein | to the Circuit ( OU O he City 6 ig nid Bea y) | ( | the Final ORDER « vie 4 OLA 6 e Citu 6 | dinia Reach ai nia ase nn, Cl |le-44'79 dated ( d In aQ he_opinion 6 Ine (OH Ophea a Aon 1X A Lhe 2 bn tor Keheating enban Was denied Ma, 10, 2018 The opinion af the Virginia Supreme | Ma e 201k. The opinion of the Zinia supreme ( ( g 0 D | x” OTATeméeot_ pl ddan D Ru e db (4a ; | the Ceasons ire Not Making application m the d Qu ( | The Coucts of the Commmuealth of Virginia including the | aderal District cou do net Cecognize Cumulative Re Lei of . . . ' " bh amendment ineffectve assistance of counsel claims. Di a ne CO ated + the Co inds that Virginia man 6 la fhe (lnited States Court of Appeals jor the Fourth Gireuit ly | led the idea -ef Cumu ative Rot “ul/ Aga tegate p e(udice 0d 6 6 G ‘tle 2¢ 6 ASSISTANCE. 6 OuUnSe AuMS a Odd , 12 SA » . lth ta! ese “Ne _ Angelone a) _ 3d. & 052 th g {2 p | Ihe. State Coucr dismissed Plain oF hone Aim _« | Linus e Reviews as follows. hecause aim [i] do IF . ” ; Dismissed Lp. 20 Nal ORDER | he UU. Q of Appeals has furthe ate