When a reviewing court on collateral appeal #1 dismisses as "non-cognizable under law" a Cumulative Effect/Aggregate Prejudice claim, asserting multiple grounds under an ineffective assistance of counsel Sixth Amendment violation, are the Defendants constitutional rights under the Due Process clause of the Fifth and dismissal contrary to Strickland v Washington, 466 us 668(1984) and its progeny?

#2. Is the Courts Holding in IN re Winship, 397 uS 358, 364 (197o) of " proof beyond a reasonable doubt of disregarded and invalidated everyfact necessary. whena state uses multiple jury instructions to supplant the proof needed of the elements of the charges? Specifically > when the state uses two (or more) jury instructions that infer the necessary proof of the elements of the charges, ace the Defendants Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments violated?

Whether the cumulative effect of multiple constitutional violations, including ineffective assistance of counsel, deprived the defendant of a fair trial