No. 18-5872
Miguel Medina-Reyes v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 3553(a) drug-trafficking federal-criminal-justice-system pre-sentence-report sentencing 3553(a) 3553(a)-factors 3553a-factors abuse-of-discretion amendment-782 criminal-procedure drug-amount drug-quantity-attribution drug-trafficking-conspiracy due-process pre-sentence-report sentencing sentencing-discretion threshold
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's due process rights were violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED e Whether Petitioner’s due process rights were violated where the district court erred by failing to determine whether, at sentencing, Petitioner was individually attributed an amount in excess of the 450 kilogram threshold under Amendment 782? e Whether Petitioner’s due process were violated * where the district court abused its discretion by oO : failing to consider the relevant factors under 3553(a)? ii
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent