Whether the state court of last resort erred by declining to review the petitioner's request for review under the plain-error doctrine and the application of §53-202k because the facts of the case do not fit the elements of the charge and there is an explicit statutory exception under Conn.Gen.Stat.§53-202k

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DID THE STATE COURT OF LAST RESORT ERROR BY DECLINING TO REVIEW THE PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW UNDER PLAIN-ERROR DOCTRIN THE APPLICATION OF §53-202k BECAUSE: A. THE FACTS OF THE CASE DOES NOT FIT THE ELEMENTS OF THE CHARGE. B. UNDER THERE IS AN EXPLICIT STATUTORY EXCEPTION. 2. WHETHER THE STATE COURT OF LAST RESORT ERROR BY REJECTING THE PETITIONER'S ARGUMENTS. © 1 All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all