Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in deciding the case without applying the law to the facts of the case

No question identified. : Soe eee Sholes Consk\\ hon . D6 persone <M\\ cekatn . _ oe ee ee. We Corsttobous\ Lighr to dhe FreeMon _ ae ps ta Oral A Que Rocess fora Pisen 0k wou fRadltly operatiog Gade tre Execohve ronda. eK Government td erente cegl anon deny nq a, fe Mosk» Peiso's Cles Arb Regulators loc. Coo _ doped. ardLin conformity WHA Iootls Hee ee _fLedstahyve Ante’ ob Stale Shite, Cae ry@ wee pth principles a Que Process AS quacartecR | Coe ee ee by THe. Dated Slotes. Condon ¢ . a oeee oo We DQ Me Eleventh Circott Cour of Depesl | a. a Jeceste the Laco ok the case Lorthout seplying 2 a... Pay lao lo the case S _ — il . 5 , + . oa : ; . . 1 a D\\ eackfes_apperc tm the caption of Khe .case oo _—_nt ie Cover Page. . _ “ aw : nn . . . . . : * “4 : 7 ; . — : , _ ve | ; aa , _ cs : + ee an —_—_: : . . -. a . . . : * . : i roc en Sn enn S| ee SN (ac WO — Gecski Monel oad Shick Posi _ | Lnvolved i —[Siatemest ob te Case — Z Pensons Fo Cracking the lost I " : PS CP a YS _ Teta Kopnties Mex To Kogendices geen dx Ag The Opinion db ne Dike [Shakes Diskdct Couck Lo Mees ARE iskeick -_ ok FlodQa 1A ppeadlis Ds Tae Criaion ob toe. L2cthede ———__ __ Shake ss Cock ok Negesls in nad fon tne Eleventh Circo, | , mepecttin C2 Reap ct tee CBee dlers}lom Hee § — _ | Tale of ANvoriiies Cihed) c/a ft Mlooighst V, Oliver 4 S.Ch 309 Cos. We 19448) p, Archers Vi Cross Wew (aberumys 312 Se2ia)% _ Chaat B. pater Uitaleriginnc 96 S.Ct ssi COS.Cal ane), 1S Cale. Vi Ball 2 Dall ase Cae) Se Lbcher V. Calomlous Cons\_ Gov't 654 Fed. Neox ese CCAR ae zo) lg Den Vite Haladlien Lad ai Tnpcovement _ Cet Row 222 C850) pn. Empice Stake E@sina (M2) Co, Vi Haale y | QoS U.S.2SS I | lg Heath vs Helos 103 S.Ct 964 COS, Or 148s), 1 _ 0. Huckle V. Rode fine State A CalPornta WO | OS. Ste (i984) NP A En ce Rdainson 13 Fla lock Cla tia) i 112. Lasker V. City of Tampa hice Dept 1s Ted, _ —___lAg , 30a COM MP oe pou) : S$ : \ ° ___| APNE rode V.PensacclA LAD Co aitaae | CRs) te [NoneM Vs NewYork Ciky Dept. ol Soe. Seu __ —13.S.Ck 2018 Ci49B) a sMoccomd Vi Dillane S80 B20. .288 Ch Scat — A a «SO 14 Wheat 128 C192) 1. Romer Vi Evans No S.Ct 1620 ( 4446). IS Sais Vi Concer NSS.G 2292 COs, Wow _—— 445) __ 4. S\rogker: Masse Cases 23 05,36 (US ta [he a” Se _ Taele J Kolhocibes Cred) Trae. _ no. Shalev. Markie CLL CoS Fla o1_Chla nce). lo, ale Shake Vi Saunders 334 So2M od) CF iaie) 2. Unie 0. Stakes ex ce), Miler V.Tiromey 414 E22 10\ COB Vea a be, Lal} UMS Doanell_ 44S. Ck 9903 COS. Ache | Flesda Stakes 20.5\ 0, dO — 120.5208), LO : ‘| ‘lo 1 p 2B £2: Was tskcadive : eye 53" GOZ.220 CAC a) NIB wA _ BUCLEME Couey OF THE UNITE) <TATES _ . Pemmou Fol war ceceemoeagy __ (Phone. cos peatQul Ay yrays Huot a lose of _ Cohocnc laste to cesbeco the re WOaemenks = : i ~ — os = 7 5 el Te opinion of tne United States Diskct Cask a a Jne opinion of He Ontte Stakes Cork | and ts on edtalislned) : oe Appents Aecidled) My CASE WAS Ockdaer 2,900. . aan | cthindy pekKon fox cementing was Bere, toy 0 Pe United) States Courk ok Depeals on (Wry ba, a JRO, Ao Q p.copy o& Me ober Leming repencing a Jaeger ak