No. 18-5897

Arthur Braddy v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2018-09-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court deprivation deprivation-of-rights due-process florida-statutes legal-procedure minimum-mandatory-sentence sentencing trial-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2018-11-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the State of Florida violate petitioner's right to due process by failing to correct the trial court's imposition of a minimum mandatory sentence which was expressly improper under the applicable Florida statutes?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED DID THE STATE OF FLORIDA VIOLATE PETITIONER’S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS BY FAILING TO CORRECT THE TRIAL COURT’S IMPOSITION OF A MINIMUM MANDATORY SENTENCE WHICH WAS EXPRESSLY IMPROPER UNDER THE APPLICABLE FLORIDA . STATUTES? 2

Docket Entries

2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-17
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2018-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2018)

Attorneys

Arthur Braddy
Arthur Braddy — Petitioner
Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent