No. 18-5901
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment attenuation-doctrine civil-rights due-process evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment illegal-search knock-and-talk law-enforcement-entry motion-to-suppress probable-cause search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying petitioner's motion to suppress evidence and statement?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented for Review I. Whether the district court erred in denying petitioner’s motion to suppress evidence and statement? Il. Whether law enforcement may attenuate their illegal presence on a citizen’s premises by merely knocking on the front door and the citizen responds to the knock by opening the front door? i
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent