No. 18-5904
Donavan Cross v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constructive-delivery constructive-possession controlled-substance-offense controlled-substances criminal-law criminal-procedure drug-delivery due-process intent sentencing sentencing-guidelines testimonial-evidence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a statute that criminalizes a constructive delivery of drugs without bona fide intent to transfer possession is a felony 'controlled substance offense' for purposes of a sentencing guidelines enhancement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | (1) Whether a statute that criminalizes a constructive delivery of drugs without bona fide intent to transfer possession is a felony “controlled substance offense” for purposes of a sentencing guidelines enhancement; and (2) Whether the Confrontation Clause prohibits an enhanced sentence based on testimonial out-of-court statements offered to prove prior bad conduct. | | | : | | |
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2018)
Attorneys
Donavan Cross
Bradley Hansen — Federal Defender's Office, Petitioner
Bradley Hansen — Federal Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent