Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging violations of due-process, civil-rights, free-speech, and retaliation

No question identified. : . aye it Bae Move Lg Aen Se MINT FE fP20B0W¢ . f0L ; SrATE Civhe LEGA. AEG NES LACS QWh) DIbN TEAL OLWILS, AT 3CO CUHAOfMS. STREET” White pane: 7 peel WPA) By THe cecd / Heil 1.5, Cover HOVSE. AL0OM LLOA 4 FOLey, SOME VI 10607 (2) “Ses Oh 75 LEGALS flO LONE LTORV ES AO 1 LfeSE (1 UF vies ‘Wer T OF CEST OLALL "heb M Lah ALSO (NFODD Fred ~ SE FLA WHE THOT fEDECALOLDELT O SHOW CAVSE EM, AfV LI CATIONS Hee STATE Lik Ms (AMermtle Tf)? "AES ~ Why bibwr [FV I9SUTEVCS) LES) TB fYMMUNTIS lt eet ELEVEN M8 bile, Meany 2017 Mekiw eT 17H 7CVS0/3) ay fee xe CFV i): (MLE Nf” i yp dibwrT MVIIS(VTN UES ELELUTIVE DICECT OQ. babs LATOVE Gerve Hes Lerten SEY es) 20/7) ce xend lity Lybot7 [fev 2 9S, VED Hive SUBNISOE HONE on af) LY y, 5 7 Lope (SEY QEL LS BLL? Le f MEE hal) Belted: 7 VI [RLV IVSOTVYCD, HIVES SOV SOU LES IND hi WH Diopte s Vag WD fe pi becee So free te (70 FOV Licefhow SAVY = DOE NTH OY BY 7 ; AW fey d4 Sy BIS) the /ELV 306 (V TOY Pf 65 nds Jip Aue VHP) IATEMLUATE, ily [hp Ao y (MISTI TEN SOD) AUD J THOS (TEV SU) LOK DALI CLE TAL) Aoent GL WEE ne PEA WT Foe la ene $— Why DoW TIEN BPE TOUS hivogE Nah, SE Hit LUNES, OF I TYR ORV SUD AD {TII0() LE AWD KF BY, WT hf VIM TE TAAATS (140; 3 0 Wh (ee ip Mod fey gaye? Tle GIR