No. 18-5914

Jeffrey Scott Finney v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-09-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 acca acca-sentencing armed-career-criminal-act criminal-history criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel johnson-decision johnson-v-united-states post-conviction-relief sentencing violent-felony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court erred in denying Jeffrey Finney's post-Johason motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the District Court erred in denying Jeffrey Finney’s post-Johason motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2018)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count

Attorneys

Jeffrey Finney
Matthew A. Campbell — Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Petitioner
Matthew A. Campbell — Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent