No. 18-5917
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review connected-conduct criminal-procedure federal-offense nexus obstruction obstructive-act reckless-endangerment relevant-conduct sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Punishment
DueProcess FifthAmendment Punishment
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the judgment of the District Court, which incorrectly applied the Sentencing Guidelines
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED IL Whether the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the judgment of the District Court, which incorrectly applied the Sentencing Guidelines when it imposed a two-level sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. §3C1.2 (“Reckless Endangerment During Flight”), finding a nexus between the obstructive act and the federal offense of conviction is not required and that a sound basis existed for relevant conduct and connected conduct anyway. i
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent