No. 18-5918
Jose Guerrero Lozano, Jr. v. Florida
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure delay due-process florida-court ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-delay prejudice speedy-trial
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State of Florida Court or the Petitioner is more to blame for the delay. Whether, in due course, and petitioner asserted a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to file a timely motion asserting his right to a speedy trial, and for the long delay he suffered prejudice as the delay's result
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the State of Florida Court or the Petitioner is more to blame for the delay. Whether, in due course, and petitioner asserted a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to file a timely motion asserting his right to a speedy trial, and for the long delay he suffered prejudice as the delay’s result. i
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2018-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2018)
Attorneys
State of Florida
C. Todd Chapman — Florida Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
C. Todd Chapman — Florida Office of the Attorney General, Respondent