No. 18-5928
Ricardo Limon-Urenda v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment ambiguous-answer criminal-procedure hearing impartial-jury impartiality ineffective-assistance juror-impartiality jury-selection prospective-juror right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance under the 6th Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD GRANT THE WRIT TO CLARIFY AN IMPORTANT AREA OF LAW RELATING TO WHETHER TRIAL COUNSEL RENDERED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER THE 6TH AMENDMENT IN FAILING TO SEEK A HEARING WHEN A PROSPECTIVE JUROR PROVIDES AN AMBIGUOUS ANSWER AS TO WHETHER HE COULD SIT AS AN IMPARTIAL JUROR? 1
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent