Ronald Jones v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether Petitioner has shown clear and convincing evidence of a credible actual-innocence claim from his State conviction?
Question(s) Presented . 1.. Whether Petitioner has shown clear and convincing evidence of . a credible actual innocence claim from his State conviction? 2.. Whether the withheld medical evidence by the State from the crimimal rape trial of Petitioner lacked the essential element proof Of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? , %3.. Whether the Petitioner's Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the United States Constitution were violated during his State criminal rape trial? a, 4. Whether the U.S. District Court's decisions in denying the Petitioner's. section 2254 petition for lack of jurisdiction, and his Fed.R.Civ.. P.. 60(6) (6) motion to reach the merits of his actual innocence claim, are contrary to the laws, the Comstitution of the United States, and to. decisions of this Court? , . 5.. Whether the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals decisions in denying the COA request by Petitioner as untimely and his petition for a rehearing to issue a COA to reach the merits of his actual innocence claim, are contrary to the laws, the Constitution of the United States, and to decisions of this Court?