Whether, under Brady v. Maryland and Kyles v. Whitley, the courts may consider information that arises after trial in determining the materiality of suppression

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Kyles v. Whitley 514 U.S. 419 (1995) the Courts may consider information that arises after Trial in determining the materiality of suppression. 2. Whether, under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) the prosecution’s deliberate suppression of information and exculpatory evidence denied the Petitioner due process rights under Brady and Kyles and effectiveness of Counsel in providing a Defense and constituted Prosecutorial Misconduct. 3. Whether the Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits the Petitioner moving for a new Trial based on juror dishonesty during Voir Dire to introduce juror testimony about statements made during deliberations that tend to show the alleged dishonesty.