No. 18-5944

Rafael Tanco-Pizarro v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2018-09-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 18-usc-3583 criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing discovery due-process revocation revocation-hearing sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation supervised-release title-18-usc
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the punishment factor of the federal sentencing statute, Title 18 U.S.C §3553(a)(2)(A), is a permissible or prohibited factor in sentencing a revocation defendant under the statute governing Revocations of Supervised Release, Title 18 USC § 3583(e)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L. Whether the punishment factor of the federal sentencing statute, Title 18 U.S.C §3553(a)(2)(A), is a permissible or prohibited factor in sentencing a revocation defendant under the statute governing Revocations of Supervised Release, Title 18 USC § 3583(e). I. Whether the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution requires a revocation defendant be granted an opportunity to request discovery, and be granted sufficient time to receive and review discovery, before the Title 18 USC § 3583(e) Supervised Release Revocation Hearing. i

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2018)

Attorneys

Rafael Tanco-Pizarro
Gail Marie LatoufGail M. Latouf, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Gail Marie LatoufGail M. Latouf, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent