No. 18-5946

William A. Parrish, Jr. v. Lyneal Wainwright, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-09-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-rights court-of-appeals due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel grand-jury-selection indigent indigent-defendant indigent-litigant judicial-discretion perjured-testimony pro-se right-to-appeal right-to-counsel self-representation speedy-trial transcript trial-transcript
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the State Court of Appeals have the authority to deny a pro se indigent litigant a copy of his trial transcript because he choose to represent himself on direct appeal of his conviction after the court failed to appoint effective assistance of counsel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Did the State Court of Appeals have the authority to deny a pro se indigent litigant a copy of his trial transcript because he choose to represent himself on direct appeal of his conviction after the court failed to appoint effective assistance of counsel? 2.) Did the State Court of Appeals deny Appellant effective assistance of appellate counsel by letting five (5) court appointed attorney's to withdraw from Appellant's case? 3.) For nearly three (3) years the State Court of Appeals finally remanded Appellant's case back to the trial court for the limited purpose of considering the omissions in the trial transcript and correction of a erroneous certification page that contain another persons name and case number attached to Appellant's trial transcript, did the trial court have the authority to exclude Appellant from the proceedings of correcting the record? 4.) Did the State trial court have the authority to try the Defendant on an” indictment that was a product of perjured testimony? 5.) Defendant is African American and the victim is a white male, did the trial court have the authority to exclude African American's from the Grand Jury and as potential jurors and try Defendant in front of a all white jury? 6.) Did the prosecutor have a duty to correct the victim's perjured testimony when the victim testified at trial admitting that he lied under oath at the preliminary hearing.. , 7.) Did the State trial court have the authority to deliberately ‘Alter Defendant's trial transcript? 8.) Did the State trial court violate Defendant's Fast & Speedy trial right's after. holding him in the County Jail for a total of 287 days without the Defendant signing a waiver of time? . 9.) Did the trial court loose jurisdiction of the Defendant after sending him to prison without a judgment entry of sentence? 10.) Did the Assistant Attorney General Jerri L. Fosnaught have the authority to falsify a official court document in a federal habeas corpus proceedings and then file that document in a federal court?. 11.) Did the trial court judge (STEVEN K. DANKOF) have the authority to enter false statements upon the record? 12.) Did the State Court of Appeals have the authority to deny Appellant the right , to appeal his conviction because he could not afford to purchase a copy of : . his trial transcript then dismiss his direct appeal for failure to prosecute? 13.) Did the State Court of Appeals have the authority to deny Appellant his right to a Fast & Speedy appeal? , oe

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent Wainwright, Warden to respond filed.
2018-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2018)

Attorneys

Wainwright, Warden
Eric E. MurphyOhio State Solicitor, Respondent
Eric E. MurphyOhio State Solicitor, Respondent
William A. Parrish
William A. Parrish Jr. — Petitioner
William A. Parrish Jr. — Petitioner