1.) WHETHER DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION TO DENY PETITIONER'S HABEAS PETITION AS BARRED BY STATUTE OF LIMITATION OF THE ANT-TERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT (AEDPA) DEBATABLE OR WRONG?

2.) 076O-13 FAILURE TO REGISTER VIOLATES PETITIONERS EX POST FACTO CLAUSE RIGHTS?

3) WHETHER PETITIONERS EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW CLAIM IS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COURT?

4) WHETHER TEXAS SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION STATUTE ART.62.OQL TX. C.CR.

5) WHETHER SEX OFFENDERS WITH CONVICTIONS PRIOR TO SEPT. 1, 1970 ARE SIMILARLY SITUATED AS SEX OFFENDERS WITH CONVICTIONS ON OR AFTER SEPT. 1, 1970?

6.) WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT'S DECISIONS IS "CONTRARY TO" CLEAR AND ESTABLISHED FEDERAL LAW3 AND/OR "UNREASONABLY APPLIED SUPREME COURT PRECEDENTS TO PETITIONER'S CASE?

7) WHETHER PETITIONER'S STATE COURT COUNSEL'S PERFORMANCE SO DEFICIENT AS TO CONSTITUTE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?

8) WHETHER PETITIONER'S INDICTMENT CAUSE NO. 114-OT6O-13 FAILURE TO REGISTER, IS FUNDAMENTALLY INVALID/VOID?

9) INVALID STATUTE ART. 62.OO2 TX.C.GR. PROC.?

10) OF THE LAW?

Whether district court's decision to deny petitioner's areas autonomy is barred by statute of limitation of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) permissible or wrong?