thore were an indictment Presented into the 17ststate
Crimina) trial court, therzafter that same indictmint
was Presanted in the 1obth civil court fortried, did
the
1obth civil coust hove Jurisdiction ta try Patitiotr on a state criminal courtindictmant?

can a non-Jurisdiation issue be roised atonltime
without ony consid cration of being excessive?

was there atrue billof indictment presented into
the (6obth civi) Loust giving i+Jurisdiationtotr) upon
Petitioner
its
Petitioner was tried and conviated inthe lolth civil
2100tno3
175Th criminal trial cousthove Jurisdiction
and issue ruling, and Judamenton Petitioner
to entertain
11,07 writs?

if Petitioner was thied and convicted in the
1665civil
Court, and The 175Th crimiho) Lourt is ruling on petitiones
11.07 writs, is the 175th denYing Peitioner ancss to court
cohstitute
Conflicting legislation?

with the
State Attorndy Knoln The indiatient did not give
1bbth civi court Juisdiction to try Patifioner do not thot
CONSTITUTE malisous prosecution?

in reviewing all the evidence did The
stateproveits Lose
brlounda ceasonablk
doubt?

Whether the lower court had jurisdiction to entertain the petitioner's claim that the indictment was presented without jurisdiction