No. 18-5966
Joseph Faulkner v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy fifth-amendment law-of-case-doctrine law-of-the-case prosecution sentencing sentencing-enhancement uncharged-conduct witte-v-united-states
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the use of uncharged conduct to increase a sentence means the conduct was used to punish, and a subsequent prosecution for the same conduct should be barred by the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: (1) Whether the use of uncharged conduct to increase a sentence means the conduct was used to punish, and a subsequent prosecution for the same conduct should be barred by the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause. i
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)
2018-05-23
Application (17A1291) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 8, 2018.
2018-05-16
Application (17A1291) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 10, 2018 to September 8, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Joseph Faulkner
Steven Allen Greenberg — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent