Whether the Second Circuit erred in granting Appellees' motion for summary affirmance while denying Chien's motions as moot

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Second Circuit erred that to grant Appellees motion for summary affirmance while to deny Chien’s three motions as moot, indicating so far there were no final solutions of the merits of following three motions: (a) to stay the District Court’s order for both penalty of pre-filing injunction and denial of Chien’s complaint, because that order erred by abandoned Rule 8(b)(6) of Fed. R. Civ. Proc by not admitting Chien’s allegations after 14 except Island Stock Transfer voluntarily, didn’t file pleadings to deny Chien’s allegations; (b) to disqualify District Court Judge because the Judge consistently violated standard procedure in bias and prejudice Chien; (c) default ‘ judgment against Appellees because none of them to file Responding Brief to answer the facts and causes raised in Chien’s Brief. : 2. Whether the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) permits the District Court for Connecticut (“CT”), following fair and impartiality, to process the pleading of the plaintiff, who has been living and working in CT, for issuing equitable relief and triple damage to protect him from injury of the liberty, property or business caused by ongoing criminal activities taken place in Virginia (“VA”), CT, Nevada, and Florida. ~iin~