Whether the court of appeals abused its discretion

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the court of appeals abused its discrection by dismissing petitioners appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e) after four years of diliberating all the issues with the lower court and the defendants. thus denying petitioners the relief sought by rejecting eveidence that is clearly visible in the record and which is based in law andinfacr. 2. Whether Innaaconnee and Chung are in direct conflict with Whitmore and Fed. Rule of Civ. P. 17 [c] [2] and whether petitioners were . prejudiced by the lower courts refusal to grant relief under these established rules of law.