Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision in Arevalo v. Hennessy, 882 F.3d 763 (9th Cir. 2018), which held that the Younger abstention doctrine does not apply to a pretrial habeas petition challenging conditions of pretrial detention, conflicts with the Fourth Circuit's decision in this case

No question identified. : . 7 in Questions) presonkd 2 ce 0 ee oe 6 oe oe eo wcors | ou Parkes ce 0 © 000 00 0 6 0 oe om wee wo ww ce 2 . Waly el Authors © oe 0 ee eo oe eet eo ee eo 2 . “Deusions beloio 2 6 0 ee © & 20 0 ow ew Oe ee ow 3B ae CJurisdichon 2 ec 8 oe oe oo oe ee co eo ae A Conshhudional and Sted deny Pruision volved. se ee H i ~ Stodement of Wa cose oe ec oe ee ee ew ce ee D oo Basie De Federal Aarisdichon ee eo te ee co coreg Reason Por ae he vor © 6 6 &@ ©. € @ ee @ r) , Oe ConMiek: uth Ser cout decline... 1 . b. Tmportena of quastions presecibed -e nce A Conclusion « eo « @ 6 &@ «© 06 * 6 06.2 6 ¢« IO —_ NecBation sce .o co «+ so ew ee ewe th -\| 6 OK ronhon AWN ALA Diuna th Lami Opprooyad OL aS va) — sla —claal eas ding —_ ; ' he oredolal vel rot are nivsotid “hy She Ste: ruminal pmeccuhion; speceatby — __ I rw KS tng excessive \oail 7 i moe diate ie LOW) nO we QQ pADiMA a) AL, « 7 k itr aamale AO. exenotion © bina tie | j Y | | a SAN Ene Hace aa tr, et Boe 4 espns TT eof Arcthentes a | eval. Hennes \,882_F. St 163 Cie, Zoid) ion itamesithe, 292-us. 305 ana) wn lihclec vw Helbao Hal Ws ur Cans) oy Bsn Bele Bes bias Dot fae ee oS. Bourn Ceo Comck of Appeals | Appeal Ne, tats a Cectithcactt— eff Appenbaliliby deniad | | Unpubliched)) Tity 27,2018 ee a ae a | ene aS. Dish Case nnn GECUY, 1S ame Youns pg ea BNO SHEN I OV a ff “eewinnee ee i ce ea a eee tener a |e en nen | a on or cea <r eetet ine mennennm te ea h omnes sane mene tiancntnnns | ; : | 7 . erent eine nee Sa aE oats tnt nen semaine intimate tact oT nt Strokes Supreme Couck has propec ee Sivaed tank ob eachardiqulvanh de wa ees Bs ne : on an ae nena ne a Slahudons Drouisions Bavalved ce . ; : " uo — Fee A US ons co 2G WSO. Bs a 29 WS.C..§ 2253 en SO ee eee pel ee en pene ee tae ton nn | a ee ee an occ tn ene nen —ebiioner was acnsled on. Oubsler 2 20l. ee ae no loaite vs ___-} . Pn —Deteie Bl 2014 pobione_wmsocouybk . shebere. . Bath enn. Magick, Sada y woth a ownsel ond apven oe ured aail of $500,000... a ae Bn_Novembees..1, 20Ile,.petthionar das. loro ua... cs co —Libbefece.. Noth Caran. -Distieh Couch Tudge 5 ne nn ~.y0ggenwoithoud counsel, ond the jootl usos.dowbled ve PtiHoneroas. finally assigned councel duceng ne he first week of ee ee ——_o an a ~ on Dee. November 1, Z6lle 1 peta tomer. wos Wood cen No. ND eae Wns Harner. prewious _ a qeouck= appounted Vorunselors.. denminetid foc ineReckiveness. — a tend..pebtHoner is owen dyeing nepoesented. oy Iai ae Kou Numecous.. Naina od) been hal cre ce ee ws ans Oo. Subs 17,2017, peitionee Sill o 82241, ae — -lWokeaspebihion.tn ILS. Dishich Cawehy Easheen. 0. ce aD) ished of Neh Consbona... This. pebthoa wes. ce ndotied ond —dusmissed vaillnout prejudice undac... cee ce Yours et OR Santer 202018 4... nent ee en i” ~G, o.. » WSs eehtHoner gene notice of appeal and. bh was Bud w UbS. FouNh Crreeit COA on a Fewh Cireut CoA on Warch 7, Zoly. . The Foul Coreuth Court of Appeals -denod o cartifrote of Sppealobilit ond Usmissed Yio appeal wutkoud pre icq OV | Tula, 27, 2018. a . Pelioner contnus bo le dclarad WN Viledion ef Wie Conshhton. a Basis For Fedora Sunisdicion a Pel Hone Vas exhausted olf reguired ONOULS .UnconsHhctonel predriaS Acatrment. Beurghad . -Wuse Wolers are Constr Honal \SSURS provides . basis Loe Fedora} Turrsddch'an « ; . The Nuthh Ciret Court of Appeals Cecwntly a — firevtalo ve Hennessy, 882. F 24 103 (oh Cir. 201%), ; Feding Vo Phe UPaanger abstenhen dd not ci ee Marina oO petition Lor ce wince of Vohens Corpus 4 Challenging, Ye conditions of pretrial detenbon Uy a . The Noth Creuk shttid +00 reasons! — | Fresh, Hae Court said Hot “Gounger absleabion AS wet appropriati. un Hus case because Hw issues _ . underlying cruminal prosecution and would not. tnterRere Sou dee That WS, reapacless of Ye a Lino dis positon of Ye load issuzy Yhe steti's Supreme Court Tushee Jackson once sad, , . independent of Yhe issues to be ted. -wotack v. Boyle, HL UWS. | (9s V sackson, J, concur) _ . .