No. 18-5996

Gene Lemay Barris v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-09-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment fifth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing unreasonable-sentence
Latest Conference: 2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the sentencing court erred in imposing an unreasonable sentence on the defendant in violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Me “ — & een eens Court Sentence C defeadent eedside ot the ee de we ae aiaelly uk ade tA Tue de bends tS ? lee A 4Cer meat. De cs ep not breacty The Conte of Pe puro Porftes beth acrac fo. A HOB OF Cow OK Sentencing Sodas Send 2 Aod VN were ele pa te Cage Zen ewe © a ofefeadent with on SSS 5 . fa Tere Cmental recht nw bwWihtes Gack oF Pavendel Gorden \ oY Claer al Seateac € ng Weer The hh ee 4 “ee ; ong, A 09 ca ji. : Centerncsel Cn conét bode enell 4 wa fe ade. Shows Fuet hee eS nel ia Ula ahidien of eS Raids + Ave Procersé 6S & AULA 7 . in Oe en ¢ WIS po ‘ e-a Carte CFhe acter . S enterc ye / , (entinees + | det : . PAC Cy fod oe Tew : | os ° : an \ etendtwd willed Peed Av wad weed cle fetor-e. peimy epeled to cdatndots now (ower Colide line Pevge. HrLeu wes Searcee ing Feclors eve Wet Clreumege of of been Ch. Hlemg « / 4 ons bowen ment: 3. Does repetated denial of Review by Publi< Defenders OFF ce 1 t a Pro is , Light of Delusen &GASts tote aw Uislatren aé cea t “ 75. Also Sh tre Feel tucd defatent hed te perat ot coated oF aptrest hedween Cebendart Qed Public Det dary OF Mie ; UtowleatiGea ot De fen dends Lights. tL}. Pots tue feed tuct 4 erbere tng Dodge o telers end qven Ts mad on ; fo Vecele Sed acide oe Course? Covert £5 & cle fenden ts JVS5 metipn’' Shen en Pe. Orstered Attorney Thywedsn s dete nhent with Chhene cued re for é vede brfien not he eve 6 LOS Pres scea hecrirg For Keer oF Ces. 4 cle Pptence OF respons it tes Pornwds, Alge fe persve ce fous 6 7 . len e4spec me at te avecd ehlhencemucats » : & fya oe P ae ; et Ae hes wot Boatity for : _&) Dees the fect Tet F ached trated edtorreg. at my Statercrm Fo ne eee os Chee it beerd ext he eduisecel Put Z hed a pmeelble Fo SueE ROW Pree’ terthe wre Prete “Le a heve been Covent vedio £. 7 en fects Smee Fo thy oraine! Seatecing Atterneg Phi! Pormegr edeisecl ne not te Awe A Soper ess ew hearing bused OW & Cotter Foun US. thera ng File w leg The intermnnt% 7 Gersticn Ste bet fred Z gold Arn dregs dere 7 Stirs fer joo it hes been PlrUvEnN duct 7 wu oe : Bear ke ; : wl Ctra a Tlet Ay ; ‘ } 7 ; veto t Vo pee hoxs turet net by i aq re he a vest acn J be: iw . ; 3 “ “4 j Pat ana \ reted ve Cendect per bien L£ f “AG PSE

Docket Entries

2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)

Attorneys

Gene L. Barris
Gene L Barris — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent