No. 18-6003
David Kavandi v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal-dismissal california-supreme-court civil-procedure constitutional-rights dismissal-of-appeal due-process failure-to-file hospitalization illness-and-hospitalization procedural-fairness statutory-right-to-appeal
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the California Supreme Court violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution or the statutory right to appeal when it dismissed the petitioner's appeal for the failure to file a miscellaneous document while the petitioner was ill and hospitalized?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the California Supreme Court violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution or the statutory right to appeal when it dismissed the petitioner's appeal for the failure to file a miscellaneous document while the petitioner was ill and hospitalized?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Rehearing DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-03
Waiver of right of respondents Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2018-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2018)
Attorneys
Time Warner Cable, Inc.
James Allen Bowles — Hill Farrer & Burrill LLP, Respondent
James Allen Bowles — Hill Farrer & Burrill LLP, Respondent