Is the KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT mandated to obey the Washington State Supreme court ruling of 1988- CrR 3.1(b)(2)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : : 1. Is the KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT mandated to obey the Washington State Supreme court ruling of 1988CrR 3.1(b)(2)? 2. Is violation of Washington State Supreme Court mandate 1988 CrR 3.1(b)(2) by the Superior court a violation of the defendants Supreme Federal Rights of ‘Due process’ violated under the federal 5 and 14" Amendments/other? Infra exhibit 1 3. Since the KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT appointment of counsel [DENNIS W. HOUGH WSBA# 11487] to the defendant William Robey violated WSSC1988-CrR 3.1(b)(2) against the defendant, -is the State et. al further guilty of U.S. 6" amendment mandate of effective assistant of counsel? Infra. exhibit 2 4, Do the court records dated January 4 1989 prove a JAMES ROE WSBA# 8553 took the place of the defendants court appointed attorney confirm the States violations of the Washington Supreme Court mandate under the 1988 CrR3.1(b)(2)? Infra exhibit 3 5. Was the State in error when Seattle police Stephen O’Leary #4333 arrested the defendant under 88-1-05878-1 SEA in regard to an alleged assault where the disabled defendant had informed #4333 that the lady had wrapped her arms around him and forced her tongue into his mouth. Is this arrest Contrary to RCW 74.34.020(2) as the defendant did speak truth and is a disabled vulnerable adult under ADA? Infra exhibit 4 6. Does court record show on September 30 1988 the King County court Judge hit his gavel stating, “ This case 88-1-05878-1 SEA is dismissed because of lack of evidence under the arresting affidavit. Was disabled defendant sent on his way? Infra. Exhibit 5 7. Does it prove this date under #6 above an unconditional release of the defendandant from the King county jail as the Judges dismissal of case 88-1-05878-1 SEA? ; 8. Is the State of Washington under 88-1-05878-1 SEA and 88-493972 in violations of US Article VI clause 2 of the United States Clause/other? 9. Has the defendant been disabled since mid-September of 1969, with severe traumatic brain injury from falling froma large cliff? Please see Infra exhibit 4, Supra 10. Has the State et.al also violated the defendants legal protections under the Americans with disabilities Act, and both State and Federal law in protections mandated for vulnerable adults and ADA? Please see Infra exhibit 4, Supra. 11. Did the State et. al follow through on the execution of a KCSC Investigation order of the mental health disability status of the defendant? Please see Infra exhibit 6. 12. Is KCSC Judge SHARON S. ARMSTRONG WSBA# 5532 in violation of Federal Oath of Office and the WSBA Oath of attorney paragraphs i through 8? Please see Infra exhibit 7. 13. Is KCSC 88-1-05878-1 SEA and 88-493972 are void ab initio? 44. Is KCSC Judge SHARON S. ARMSTRONG WSBA# 5532 in violation under void ab initio and considered in law, as a trespasser? Under Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)? 15. Did the U.S. Supreme Court state “No State legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his/her undertaking to support it”? Under Federal Cooper v. Aron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S Ct. 1402 (1958)? 16. Does the court document show the affidavit used to arrest the disabled defendant Robey on 09-27-1988 under case # 88-1-05878-1 SEA? Infra. Exhibit 8 17. Does the exact same court document also show the exact same : affidavit used for charges against Robey in an absolute new arrest with the same charges as a ‘cover-up’ from violations of 5 ; amendment ‘double jeopardy’ against the disabled defendant. in State case # 88-1-05878-1 under a completely new case# 493972 dated 11-3-1988, with the same document dated on the top left arrest date 09-27-1988? Infra. Exhibit 9 . ; 18. Does the US Supreme Court recognize the font pointed at on this same document in the middle cutting off unit #322, the phone number, and the signature as a cover-up for the dismissal of case# 88-1-05878-1 SEA and 5th Amendment double jeopardy? Infra. exhibit 8 and exhibit