Whether the legislative mandate of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-1,135 violates the separation of powers doctrine by requiring the judicial branch to conduct a review of executive branch administrative decisions?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. Ba clake divecher ever 2 avs /64 provedted be Phe Us, Const fulton oom ass/ yn ng te Autres of lepslive mandate ol WAS 116.156 te Pe podietal branch Fe 4e. carvted, covet bq aAsthict cow? AGEs (athe Fhag by execute branch achnaisPrabrs ? Gee txt) : 2. Does te reste lack ol dearustretve witfhen notice. of ARS {16-156 doh wont, yb exercles robe Therect-y , cause constbhiherad harm en fo) yeows lyler when the fret bree din f He anchalengecl Ae-sorttoce report “s used 4, pr lson-SJotP parole. vecommenclitions tb eur L uhon He prison Shue hee of hyn pare prison conhhues / Ae. Dama. oppor voy Bb tafe She bee od feed boee ole relied an by gorernmenit ts wlllag Cehase bg hull of fall anet fae constobeat ion j 3, Des the shife court of ayeals violate We puke of reason ancl conshyiyfien by adlypjtng The obthtetde/al courts Adve tat cpptat bad reasarable pportunl fs “*# vafse. on apgiealofaheas petbhion, or does evtrhinee of: om /ss/orr adufted by state coustitye \goin Wher forence. by of Prelafs 2 Mcray y Carrier 77 US 106