No. 18-6023

Lamar Atu Blackwell v. Matthew Hansen, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus postconviction-procedure postconviction-review prosecutorial-misconduct strickland-standard strickland-v-washington swarthout-v-cooke unreasonable-application webb-v-texas
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-10-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether this Court's opinion in Webb v. Texas applies to prosecutors as well as judges

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether this Court’s opinion in Webb v. Texas, 409 U.S. 95, 93 S. Ct. 351, 34 L. Ed. 2d 330 (1972) applies to prosecutors as well as judges; : II. Whether the unreasonable application standard set forth in . 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is distinguishable from the Strickland standard, and whether a petitioner must address both prongs of Strickland in order for unreasonable application to be found; III. Whether this Court’s holding in Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216 (2009) implies that a State’s failure to follow its own postconviction procedural rules can violate due process. . of :

Docket Entries

2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-24
Waiver of right of respondents Hansen, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2018-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2018)

Attorneys

Hansen, Warden, et al.
L. Andrew CooperOffice of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
Lamar Atu Blackwell
Lamar A. Blackwell — Petitioner