Was Trial Counsel's failure to object to the District Court's determination and findings of the drug amount attributable to the Petitioner objectively unreasonable assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Was Trial Counsel's failure to object to the District Court's determination and findings of the drug amount attributable to the . Petitioner objectively unreasonable assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. os (II), : Was Trial Counsel's advisement for Petitioner to enter a guilty , plea to the Money Laundering Count, which carries a.statutory , maximum penalty of twenty years imprisonment, as opposed to the ; ' Dog Fighting Count, which carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years imprisonment, ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the a United States Constitution. so, : (III) . Was Trial Counsel‘s advisement to the Petitioner of the benefits of enteringyinto a plea of guilty without an enhanced penalty for ' a supervisory role when the evidence would have been clear in showing ° otherwise, ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the ‘ counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States ~ Constitutior. ,