No. 18-6029
Debra Ann Aquilina v. Sarah Davis, Administrator, Edna Mahan Correctional Facility, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cause-of-death constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process expert-opinion expert-testimony ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-examiner right-to-counsel right-to-effective-counsel sixth-amendment trial-counsel trial-errors trial-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the petitioner's trial counsel provide constitutionally ineffective assistance, violated petitioner's right to effective assistance of counsel, because of two glaring errors during the trial proceedings?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; QUESTION ONE: ; Did the petitioner’s trial counsel provide constitutionally ineffective assistance, violated petitioner’s right to effective assistance of counsel, because of two glaring errors during the trial proceedings? QUESTION TWO: SO Was the testimony of the medical examiner regarding the cause and manner 4 of death of the victim an inadmissible “net” expert opinion? . ,
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-30
Waiver of right of respondents Sarah Davis, et al. to respond filed.
2018-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2018)
Attorneys
Sarah Davis, et al.
Catherine A. Foddai — BERGEN COUNTY PROS. OFFICE, Respondent
Catherine A. Foddai — BERGEN COUNTY PROS. OFFICE, Respondent