No. 18-6035
Zachary Chambers v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion constitutional-rights criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining right-to-counsel sentencing sentencing-exposure sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court abused its discretion in ruling that trial counsel's erroneous advice about petitioner's sentencing exposure if he proceed to trial did not violate petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to have the effective assistance of counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the lower court abused its discretion in ruling that ; . trial counsel's erroneous advice about petitioner's sentencing exposure if he proceed to trial did not violate petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to have the effective assistance of counsel? i
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent