Should there be a precedent from the Court that protects pro-se-prisoners' right to contest misconstrued-of-pro-se-claims?

No question identified. : Question: : 1.) Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S. Ct. 594, 30 L. Ed. 2d 652 (1972), allows a court unfettered authority to construe pro se prisoner claims. Should there be a precedent from the , Court that protects pro se prisoners’ right to contest misconstrued of pro se claims? : 2.) Does equal protection under the law and equal access to the court require pro se prisoners be afforded a full and fair opportunity to contest misconstrued pro se prisoner claims? 3.) When state rules and practices block pro se prisoners from contesting misconstrued pro se claims, should there be a precedent from the Court that protects equal protection under the law . and equal access to the court? . ii : /